Double
Entry Journal- Chapter 1: Teaching the Language Arts
Kimberly
Artman- August 25, 2012
Pamela
Farris draws our attention to the importance of language in the book Language Arts: Process, Product, and
Assessment. She introduces the
typical use of language arts with the beginning teacher (pg. 1-5) that uses
popular children’s’ literature to entice open ended questions. This sparks a discussion among the children
and the teacher guides the discussion to include phonemic awareness, grammar
and vocabulary with a word wall supporting the book she is reading. This whole language approach is different
than years past. In the 1800’s the
teaching method of choice was lecture style with a “listen only” mentality as
the teacher was the only oral participant.
In the 1900’s however phonics were introduced as well as silent
reading. Basal readers became popular in
1950’s and individual integration along with whole language learning was
introduced in the 70’s and 80’s. It
wasn’t until the turn of the century that balanced reading, including phonics
and comprehension came into play. The No
Child Left Behind Act was introduced and the government held schools
accountable for all children to become proficient in reading and math. This high expectation to have all children
reading at grade level, frustrated teachers and new techniques, in various
forms, were applied. Farris suggests
teachers use a whole language approach that includes listening, speaking,
reading, writing, viewing and visual representation. Farris says “As teachers we must understand
each of the language arts individually so that we can better teach them in
integrated fashion.” (pg. 32)
I have been teaching for 10 years and it
seems there is always a pendulum swing in styles of teaching. Teachers are being introduced to new methods
of curriculum instruction it seems on a yearly basis. When No Child Left Behind came out in 2002,
teachers were held accountable for instructing students to pass a test which
heavily focused on reading and math. All
students were expected to be at grade level regardless of background, race, or
cultural influence. The expectations
were set to high to not take into account all aspects of a students
learning. I teach visual arts and I did
a year of student teaching in the 4th grade classroom. I asked the mentor teacher when I could
incorporate more lessons that were visually stimulating integrating the arts to
other subject area like Science, History, and Handwriting. I believed artwork
would grab their attention and make learning more enjoyable. She said the school system had adopted
special books and teachers were to stick to the material. Math and reading were
to take up the majority of the instructional time with little allowance for
other areas. It was if teachers were
expected to follow a plan set forth by the school board and administration that
allowed little diversity of the daily, scheduled routine. I incorporated Readers Theater to add drama
integrated with their daily reading. I
also incorporated journal writing and drawing into students reflections after an
oral reading of a piece of literature. I
added a 3D assignment (sculpture) into the research of pit houses on a unit of
Southwest Native Americans. I have
always thought that the arts were a vital aspect into any core subject
area. I love that this book believes on
the integration of all styles of learning including visual representation. Each child needs to experience lessons using
all types of senses including sight, sound, and touch. The fine arts bridge the learning style gap
through music, dance, theater, singing, and visual arts.